Legal Opinion

Lorenz v. Commercial Acceptance Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 1, 1995No. H013272PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELIA, J.

Plaintiffs Gary Lorenz and Mary Ross appeal after the trial court vacated a $2,250,000 default judgment against defendant Commercial Acceptance Insurance Co. (hereafter, CAIC). (Code Civ. Proc., § 473.) Plaintiffs contend the trial court erred in vacating the default judgment. For reasons we shall explain, we conclude the trial court did not err. We will therefore affirm the judgment.

Facts and Procedural Background

Mary Ross was injured when she lost control of her vehicle while driving on a road improved for Holiday Estates Maintenance Association (hereafter, Holiday) by Gary…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. People v. OverstreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Shamblin v. BrattainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Johansen v. California State Automobile Ass'n Inter-Insurance BureauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Gikas v. ZolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. County of Sacramento v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Leader v. Health Industries of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. English v. Ikon Business Solutions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Avila v. ChuaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Lang v. HochmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. SOLV-ALL v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API