Legal Opinion

Boyle v. Howe

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 27, 1935PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice Whitfield, Mr. Justice Buford and Mr. Justice Davis are of the opinion that the decree of the Circuit Court should be affirmed as to Pelchat and reversed as to Bethel and Boyle, while Mr. Presiding Justice Ellis, Mr. justice Terrell and Mr. Justice Brown are of the opinion that the decree of the Circuit Court should be affirmed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the decree should be affirmed or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hampton v. McClungSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
  2. Griffith v. AlcockeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Richardson v. State Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Estate of FletcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. BARNETT FIRST NAT. BANK, ETC. v. CobdenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Christian Herald Ass'n v. First Nat. Bank of TampaSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
  5. In Re Williams'estateSupreme Court of Florida · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API