Legal Opinion

Richardson v. State Compensation Commissioner

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1953No. 10520PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lovusrs, Judge:

Percy Richardson, claimant, filed his application for compensation benefits on the grounds that he was suffering from silicosis. The State Compensation Commissioner, hereinafter designated as commissioner, after investigation, made certain nonmedical findings, hereinafter detailed, and referred the claim to the Silicosis Medical Board for review, to which action the employer protested.

A hearing was held on such protest, after which the commissioner affirmed his former order. The Silicosis Medical Board, under date of January 18, 1952, found that claimant was suffering from…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hereford v. MeekWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Newhart v. PennybackerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. McVey v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. State Ex Rel. Cosner v. SeeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Walk v. State Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Simpkins v. HarveyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Hockman v. County Court of Tucker CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Taylor-Hurley v. Mingo County Board of EducationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Benson v. RobertsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Rogers v. State Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API