Legal Opinion

St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. State

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 9, 1973No. 45288PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice:

The question presented herein is whether the Corporation Commission erred in denying appellant’s application to reduce hours of agency service at its agencies in Antlers, Clayton and Talihina.

Appellant, which presently maintains an agent in each station for 8 hours a day, five days a week, requested modification of hours of agency service under a plan referred to as “tripilization.” Under tripil-ization a single agent will drive between the stations, and will be in Antlers from 8:00 A.M. until 11:00 A.M., in Clayton from 12:30 P.M. until 1:30 P.M., in Talihina from 2:00 P.M.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Kurn v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Kingwood Oil Company v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  5. Lowden v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barnes v. Transok Pipeline CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  3. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1974
  4. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API