Legal Opinion
Callahan v. Dearborn Developments Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 23, 1959PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
57 N.J. Super. 437 (1959)
154 A.2d 865
EUGENE CALLAHAN, JR., AN INFANT, BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, MARY CALLAHAN, AND MARY CALLAHAN AND EUGENE CALLAHAN, HER HUSBAND, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
DEARBORN DEVELOPMENTS INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 21, 1959.
Decided October 23, 1959.
Before Judges CONFORD, FOLEY and SCHERER.
Mr. John W. Leyden, Jr., argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents (Messrs. Leyden and Monaghan, attorneys).
Mr. William R. Morrison argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. Morrison,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wytupeck v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Strang v. South Jersey Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Bartleson v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Simmel v. New Jersey Coop Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Ambrose v. CyphersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Scheck v. Houdaille Const. Materials, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
- Turpan v. MerrimanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- Jasiczek v. PENN. RR CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
- Samuel Fulginiti, a Minor by His Guardian, Michael A. Marolla v. Peter Tocco and Margaret M. ToccoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- ALEXANDER S. CORTES VS. GARRAD CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC. (L-1341-16, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019