Legal Opinion

Massey v. Sunrise Hospital

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1986No. 16370PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Bertha and Donald Massey initiated a claim against Sunrise Hospital for professional malpractice. They later amended their complaint to name Ralph J. Litton, M.D., as a co-defendant. Dr. Litton was granted a separate trial in order to hear his statute of limitations defense. A jury returned a verdict in favor of Dr. Litton. Later, Sunrise Hospital moved to dismiss for want of prosecution pursuant to NRCP 41(e). The district court granted this motion. The Masseys argue that the district court erred in its construction of the rule. We agree. Therefore, we reverse and remand for further…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. MassieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Massey v. LittonNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Boren v. City of North Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Wilmurth v. State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Moser v. Zion's Co-Op. Merchantile Inst.Utah Supreme Court · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Home Savings Ass'n v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Monroe v. Columbia Sunrise Hospital & Medical CenterNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Carstarphen v. MilsnerNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Bell & Gossett Co. v. Oak Grove InvestorsNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Lipitt v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API