Legal Opinion

Bell & Gossett Co. v. Oak Grove Investors

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1992No. 21288PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*959OPINION

2Per curiam

This lingering controversy arose from problems with a hot water plumbing system installed in a large Reno apartment complex. Various subcontractors contributed to the plumbing system that improperly combined the domestic hot water system with the hot water heating system and utilized monoflow plumbing fittings manufactured by appellant Bell & Gossett Company. Allegedly, the fittings supplied by Bell & Gossett were inappropriate for the apartment complex plumbing system, and increased the water velocity beyond safe limits, causing erosion and corrosion. The hot water pipes began to…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Department of Transportation v. ThompsonNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Oak Grove Investors v. Bell & Gossett Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Lindauer v. AllenNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Boren v. City of North Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Johnson v. HarberNevada Supreme Court · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pack v. LATOURETTENevada Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Monroe v. Columbia Sunrise Hospital & Medical CenterNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Carstarphen v. MilsnerNevada Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API