Industrial, Technical & Professional Employees Division, National Maritime Union v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Circuit Judge:
The National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) found that Monfort of Colorado, Inc. (“Monfort”) violated §§ 8(a)(1) and (2) of the National Labor Relations Act (“Act”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 158(a)(1) and (2), by giving unlawful assistance and support to the National Maritime Union (“NMU”) and by recognizing, and entering into a collective bargaining agreement with, NMU at a time when NMU did not represent an uncoerced majority of Monfort’s employees. The Board found that NMU violated § 8(b)(1)(A) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(b)(1)(A), by accepting such unlawful assistance and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Link-Belt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Ford Motor Co. (Chicago Stamping Plant) v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Clear Pine Mouldings, Inc., Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- National Labor Relations Board v. Antonino Carilli, D/B/A Antonino's RestaurantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- National Labor Relations Board v. Forest City/dillon-Tecon PacificCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Industrial, Technical And Professional Employees Division, National Maritime Union Of America, Afl-Cio, Petitioner v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982