Legal Opinion

State v. Smith, 21833 (6-8-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 2007No. 21833PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Edward L. Smith appeals from the trial court's termination entry imposing an aggregate eight-year prison sentence following our earlier remand for resentencing pursuant to State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856.

{¶ 2} In his sole assignment of error, Smith contends the Ohio Supreme Court's Foster decision operates as an ex post facto law and violates his due process rights by removing the presumption of a minimum term of incarceration for first-time offenders.

{¶ 3} The record reflects that Smith was convicted of reckless homicide with a firearm specification. On March…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. BruceOhio Court of Appeals · 2007

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Carver, 21328 (9-12-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. State v. Molen, 21941 (11-26-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State v. Hayes, 21914 (1-4-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. State v. Boyd, 22004 (3-7-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API