Legal Opinion

State v. Hayes, 21914 (1-4-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 4, 2008No. 21914PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Tenika Hayes appeals from her conviction and sentence following a jury trial on charges of aggravated robbery and felonious assault with accompanying firearm specifications.

{¶ 2} Hayes advances three assignments of error on appeal. First, she contends the trial court erred in overruling her objection to certain eyewitness identification testimony. Hayes claims the evidence should have been excluded from trial because the State failed to inform her about it during discovery. Second, she argues that the trial court violated her constitutional rights by imposing more than minimum…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. City of Columbus v. BeeOhio Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. State v. Dawson, 21768 (9-28-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State v. Smith, 21833 (6-8-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Nunez, 22208 (7-3-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. State v. Frock, 07ca102 (9-5-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API