Legal Opinion

State v. Molen, 21941 (11-26-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 26, 2008No. 21941PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Gary Molen appeals from his conviction and sentence on two counts of rape of a child under age thirteen in violation of R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(b).

{¶ 2} Molen advances eight assignments of error on appeal. First, he contends the trial court committed plain error by conducting a deficient pre-trial competence examination of the victim. Second, he claims his rape convictions are against the manifest weight of the evidence because the victim's testimony was fraught with inconsistencies and fantastic allegations. Third, he asserts that the trial court committed plain error by allowing the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. NewettOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. State v. BallardOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. State v. CassellOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. State v. PearsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. State v. Schmidt, 08ap-348 (3-31-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API