Reed v. Smith
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Mendocino County and from an order denying a new trial. J. W. Hannon, Judge. The facts are stated m the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
This is an action to quiet title to certain lands described in the complaint. The defendant Elizabeth is the daughter of the deceased Piercy, and the other defendant, J. D. Smith, is her husband. Judgment went for the defendants, from which and from an order denying the motion for a new trial the plaintiff appeals.
The court found that in 1887, at which time the decedent was the owner of the premises, he made, executed, and delivered to the defendant Elizabeth a deed conveying to her the property here involved. Such a deed, purporting to convey the property to her and dated June 21, 1887, was…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Chamberlain Etl Al. v. LarsenUtah Supreme Court · 1934
- Follmer v. RohrerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Blackledge v. McIntoshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Storrow v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Tully v. TullyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.