Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. McClintock

District Court, D. Wyoming

Decided September 2, 1927No. 1684PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, District Judge.

This is a suit in equity brought for the purpose of determining the relative rights of the receiver of the insolvent First National Bank of Cheyenne and three surety companies, growing out of a deposit by the county of Lara*945mie, Wyo., in that bank at the time the bank was closed; one of the surety companies being an indemnitor of the county upon such deposit, and the other two being the official sureties of the county treasurer in guaranteeing the faithful performance of his official duties as such.

The case is submitted upon an agreed statement of facts, which appears…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Centropolis Bank of Kansas City, Mo.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  3. National Surety Co. v. Salt Lake CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  4. National Surety Co. v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Beaver County v. Home Indemnity Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Netherton v. Farmers Exchange BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API