Smith v. City of Shakopee
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Appeal from the District 'Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota^,-
1Opinion of the Court
THAYER, Circuit Judge.
In our former opinion in this case (97
Fed. 974, 38 O. C. A. 617), we held that we could not take judicial notice of the regulations of the lighthouse board prescribing the number and kinds of lights to be placed on the draws of bridges across navigable streams, because the regulations were neither pleaded nor offered in evidence, so far as the record discloses. In support of that: view we cited the following cases: The E. A. Packer, 140 U. S. 360, 367, 11 Sup. Ct. 794, 35 L. Ed. 453, and The Clara, 14 U. S. App. 346, 5 C. C. A. 390, 55 Fed. 1021. Our attention was called…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Knight v. United States Land Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Caha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- The Max MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- United States v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sciola's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Ex parte LairDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1910
- City of Marinette v. Goodrich Transit Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Munroe v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1911
- Federal Barge Lines, Inc. v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.