Legal Opinion
Walsh v. Ford Motor Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1972PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittoni, J.
Defendants, Ford Motor Co., the manufacturer, and McGoldrick, the dealers, have been sued for their negligence, for breach of implied warranty, and for breach of expressed warranty. The jury has rendered verdicts against defendant Ford for all three, and against defendants McGoldrick for negligence and for breach of implied warranty.
Defendants McGoldrick now cross-claim against defendant Ford on the negligence and implied warranty causes.
Defendants Ford and McGoldrick stipulated at the beginning of the trial that the cross claims would be taken from the jury’s consideration and that I would…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McFall v. Compagnie Maritime Belge (Lloyd Royal) S. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- McSpedon v. KunzNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Eisenbach v. Gimbel Bros., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
3Cited by9 opinions
- Board of Education v. Sargent, Webster, Crenshaw & FolleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Lippes v. Atlantic BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Tokio Marine & Fire Insurance v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Zillman v. Meadowbrook Hospital Co.New York Supreme Court · 1973
- Slotkin v. Brookdale Hospital CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.