Legal Opinion

Simmons v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided August 17, 1990No. 87-2351-TUBPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

TURNER, District Judge.

This is an action brought in the General Sessions Court of Shelby County, Tennessee, for “failure to act in good faith and breach of contract.” Defendant removed the case to this court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441, on the basis that the plaintiff’s claim is one for pension benefits governed by the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). Presently before the court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The pleadings, affidavit,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Sheets v. Selden's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  4. Stephen Brown, Douglas Shepard, Edward Schweikert, Thomas McCoy and Charles Tomasello v. Ampco-Pittsburgh Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  5. Burnet v. Willingham Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Andre v. Salem Technical ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
  2. In Re ColeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API