Legal Opinion
Andre v. Salem Technical Services
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 9, 1992No. 91 C 5462PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, Senior District Judge.
Steven Andre (“Andre”) suffered a heart attack just after leaving a job at Stepan Company (“Stepan”) for a new job at Salem Technical Services (“Salem”). Both companies denied insurance coverage for that misfortune: Salem because Andre was not yet officially enrolled in its health plan, and Stepan because Andre’s coverage under its plan had lapsed. Andre claims that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA,” 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1145 1 ) requires one company or the other to provide him with retroactive coverage.
All three…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Pens. Plan Guide P 23918c Raymond K. Panaras v. Liquid Carbonic Industries Corporation and Cbi Industries, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Neuma, Incorporated, an Illinois Corporation v. Amp, Incorporated and Provident Life and Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Raymond v. Mobil Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Aquilio v. Police Benevolent Ass'n of New York State Troopers, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1994
- Moriarity v. United Technologies Corp. Represented Employees Retirement PlanDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.