Legal Opinion

State v. . Deherrodora

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoNNOR, J.

On 22 February, 1925, tbe individual defendants were rural police officers of Mecklenburg County. Eacb bad been duly appointed to bis office by tbe board of commissioners of said county, under tbe provisions of chapter 664, Public-Local Laws, 1917. Eacb, upon bis appointment and qualification bad executed a bond, conditioned as required by section 6 of said statute. Tbe penal sum of eacb bond was $1,000. Defendant, New Amsterdam Casualty Company, was surety on tbe bond of G-. O. DeHerrodora, and defendant, Massachusetts Bonding' and Insurance Company, was surety on tbe bond of eacb of tbe…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sossamon v. Cruse.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. State v. . GodetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Melton v. RickmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Melton v. . RickmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Rhodes v. . CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Robinson v. City of Winston-SalemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Garrett v. . GarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API