Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. . Collins

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 27, 1929PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOiARKsoN, J.

We have read with care the record. The allegations of the complaint appear to set out a double-barrel action permissible under our liberal practice, “Wrongful and malicious prosecution, false arrest and wrongful detention,” and tried out on false arrest and imprisonment.

“False imprisonment” is based upon the deprivation of one’s liberty without legal process, while malicious prosecution is for a prosecution founded upon legal process, but maintained maliciously and without probable cause. Rosendale v. Market Square Dry Goods Co. (Mo.), 213 S. W., 169, 171. Allen v. Greenlee, 13 N. C., 370.

The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. R. R. v. . Hardware Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Railroad Co. v. Hardware Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Riley v. StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. Stancill v. . UnderwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. Allen v. . GreenleeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1830

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Carson v. DoggettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Melton v. RickmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Melton v. . RickmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Alexander v. LindseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Perry v. . HurdleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API