Legal Opinion

Garrett v. . Garrett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 25, 1948PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

It is a generally accepted rule that where two or more persons unite or intentionally act in concert in committing a wrongful act, or participate therein with common intent, they are jointly and severally liable for the resulting injuries. S. v. DeHerrodora, 192 N. C., 749, 136 S. E., 6; Williams v. Lumber Co., 176 N. C., 174, 96 S. E., 950; Trust Co. v. Peirce, 195 N. C., 717, 143 S. E., 524, and cases cited; Moses v. Morganton, 192 N. C., 102, 133 S. E., 421. See also 52 A. J., 448-50 and notes where copious authorities are cited.

“Where there is a common intent to assault and beat, or where…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. PeirceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. Moses v. Town of MorgantonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Smithwick v. . WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1859
  4. Williams v. Cape Fear Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  5. Meints v. HuntingtonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ge Betz, Inc. v. ConradCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  2. Keel v. HainlineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  3. Hobbs v. GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. United Leasing Corp. v. GuthrieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  5. Crescent Univ. City Venture, LLC v. Ap Atl., Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API