Legal Opinion

King v. King

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1902PublishedCited by 11 opinions

■ Appear by the plaintiff, Beatrice Presswood King, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 3d day of February, 1902, upon the verdict of a jury rendered by direction of the court, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 3d day of February, 1902, denying the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

1Opinion of the Court

Goodrich, P. J:

On a former appeal from an order granting a motion to amend a warrant of attachment (59 App. Div. 128) we held on authority *548that an assignment of a portion of a debt is valid. “ Whether the plaintiff,” said Mr. Justice Hirschbero, writing for the court, can successfully enforce her rights in the action without bringing in the other beneficiaries is not now considered or determined.” The present appeal brings up this question. .

Mr. Morse, one of the executors of the will of Robert King, deceased, accepted from the defendant his note for $9,000, dated May 1,1878, payable to “…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chambers v. . LancasterNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. King v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. SchrubenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  2. Dickinson v. TysenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  3. Porter v. Lane Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  4. Blake v. WeidenNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Barkley v. MullerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API