Legal Opinion

Barkley v. Muller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 6, 1914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Joseph H. S. Muller and others, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 8th day of May, 1914, overruling separate demurrers by the several defendants to the complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

Dowling, J.:

The complaint herein, after setting forth that the defendant Muller made his promissory note in writing on a certain date, whereby he promised to pay to the order of George B. Burch, at the Hudson Trust Company in the city of New York, the sum of $2,500 four months after said date, further proceeds to allege: “That the defendants George B. Burch and Sarah M. Burch, thereafter and before maturity of said note, for value, indorsed the one-half interest therein to and delivered the same to this plaintiff, who is now the owner and holder thereof. ”

By section 62 of the Negotiable…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. King v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  2. King v. KingNew York Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blake v. WeidenNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Goodwin v. Investors & Traders Reality Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  3. Barkley v. MullerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  4. Schwartz v. Partos Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API