Legal Opinion

Conahan v. Fisher

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 1990No. Docket 115221PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal as of right the January 31, 1989, order granting defendants’ motions for summary disposition. We affirm. Plaintiffs sought damages for termite infestation repairs to the house they purchased "as is” from defendants Dorothy and Duard Fisher. Plaintiffs alleged that the sellers should have warned them of the termite problem either directly or through their real estate agents, defendants Carol Stanley and Michael C. Scholtz of defendant Preview Properties, Inc.

Plaintiffs argue that the trial court erred in granting summary disposition to the sellers since there were disputed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gruett v. Total Petroleum, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. WoodMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. S Development Co. v. Pima Capital Management Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  2. Lorenzo v. NoelMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Clemens v. LesnekMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Ramco-Gershenson Properties L.P. v. Hoover Annex Group LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
  5. Edward Scott Kondrat v. Arnold ServittoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API