Legal Opinion

Wormald U.S., Inc. v. Cedar Chemical Corp.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 22, 1994No. 92-1423PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Randy F. Philhours, Special Justice.

This case involves a suit brought pursuant to the provisions of the Arkansas Remedial Action Trust Fund Act (RATFA). Appellant, Wormald U.S., Inc. (Wormald), attempts to appeal from a partial summary judgment granted in favor of Cedar Chemical Corporation (Cedar). We dismiss the appeal.

Cedar brought suit against Wormald for recovery of costs incurred by Cedar in cleaning up contamination on Cedar’s property in compliance with a Consent Administrative Order of the Arkansas Department of Pollution Control and Ecology. The suit was brought pursuant to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Franklin v. Osca, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Davis v. Wausau Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Arkansas Department of Human Services v. FarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Barr v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  5. Wallner v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kowalski v. Rose Drugs of Dardanelle, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  2. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. EubanksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Guebert v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. Stratton v. Arkansas State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API