Legal Opinion

Wallner v. McDonald

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 9, 1992No. 91-299PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

The appellants, Jack D. and Billie F. Wallner, have appealed from a decision denying their claim for specific performance. After holding against the Wallners, the Chancellor purported to amend the pleadings to state a claim for damages and transferred the case to circuit court. We dismiss the appeal because the Chancellor’s action in certifying that there was no need for delay was insufficient to comply with Ark. R. Civ. P. 54(b) and the order transferring the case to circuit court is not appealable. Ark. R. App. P. 2(a).

In 1986 the parishioners of St. Elizabeth…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Franklin v. Osca, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Arkhola Sand & Gravel Co. v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. McIlroy Bank & Trust v. ZuberSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  4. Middleton v. StilwellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  5. King ex rel. King v. Little Rock School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Davis v. Wausau Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Downing v. Lawrence Hall Nursing CenterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  3. Guebert v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. Wormald U.S., Inc. v. Cedar Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Freeman v. Colonia InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API