State v. Ui.
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOpinion Of The Court By Pollack, J.
The right to have all elements of a charged criminal offense proven beyond a reasonable doubt is one of the fundamental principles of our justice system. In State v. Murray , we held that a trial court must engage a defendant in an on-the-record colloquy to ensure that the defendant is intelligently, knowingly, and voluntarily relinquishing this fundamental right before the court may accept the defendant's admission of an element of a crime. 116 Hawai'i 3 , 12, 169 P.3d 955 , 964 (2007). We now reiterate our holding in Murray and decline to establish an exception to the colloquy requirement…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Coffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- State v. RichieHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
- Gonzalez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brenda Porter v. Commonwealth of KentuckyKentucky Supreme Court · 2024
- State v. WilsonHawaii Supreme Court · 2019