Legal Opinion

State v. Ui.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 2018No. SCWC-15-0000402PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOpinion Of The Court By Pollack, J.

The right to have all elements of a charged criminal offense proven beyond a reasonable doubt is one of the fundamental principles of our justice system. In State v. Murray , we held that a trial court must engage a defendant in an on-the-record colloquy to ensure that the defendant is intelligently, knowingly, and voluntarily relinquishing this fundamental right before the court may accept the defendant's admission of an element of a crime. 116 Hawai'i 3 , 12, 169 P.3d 955 , 964 (2007). We now reiterate our holding in Murray and decline to establish an exception to the colloquy requirement…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Coffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. State v. RichieHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Gonzalez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brenda Porter v. Commonwealth of KentuckyKentucky Supreme Court · 2024
  2. State v. WilsonHawaii Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API