Legal Opinion

National Benefit L. Ins. Co. v. Davis

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 13, 1929No. 9999PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VICKERY, PJ.

Now the right of the plaintiff to maintain this action is based first upon the decision of our Supreme Court in the case of Filmore vs. The Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, 82 O. S. 208.

The question then arises whether this policy becomes uncollectible because the sole beneficiary being in a position where she cannot collect, is to indirectly have the benefit of any part- of this policy and the insurance. It might be that the policy had been carried for a great many years, and there have been a large amount of premiums paid on the policy and manifestly it would be wrong to…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. De Zoteel v. Mutual Life InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  2. National Life Ins. Co., Etc. v. Hood's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  3. Huff v. Union Fidelity Life InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Travelers Ins. v. Gray, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1973
  5. Polish National Alliance of U S of North America v. CrowleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API