Legal Opinion

Polish National Alliance of U S of North America v. Crowley

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 12, 1930No. 10708PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

It is argued that the clause quoted is part and parcel of the contract of insurance as it is a clause from the constitution and bylaws of the plaintiff in error. There can be no question about this but the real question is whether, under this clause there is any stipulation that prevents the minor children or the estate from recovering the benefits of the insurance policy. There can be no question but that the clause noted, by contractual effect bars the beneficiary, the widow, but the provision ends there and the policy, so to speak, hangs in the air because there is no provision which voids…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Benefit L. Ins. Co. v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Griffith v. Mutual Protective LeagueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. McDade v. Mystic Workers of the WorldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Estate of KrakoffOhio Probate Court of Franklin County · 1961
  2. Cook v. Western & Southern Life Insurance, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API