Brand v. Lienkaemper
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Yakima county, Grady, J., entered December 4, 1911, upon findings in favor of the defendants, in an action for an injunction.
1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.
The single question presented by this appeal is, whether the respondents have acquired an easement by prescription to flow waste water over the premises of the appellants. The court found in favor of the respondents. The respondent Lienkaemper owns a tract of land lying immediately east of the lands of the appellants. A public road has been laid out between the two tracts. The respondent Arpke owns a tract of land immediately to the east of the Lienkaemper tract. Arpke acquired title in 1906. Lienkaemper acquired title in 1905. The appellant acquired title in 1907. The lands of all the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hesperia Land & Water Co. v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Hoyt v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Wasmund v. HarmWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Silva v. HawnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Schumacher v. BrandWashington Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by6 opinions
- Northwest Cities Gas Co. v. Western Fuel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- City of Benton City v. AdrianCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
- Beasley v. EngstromIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
- Smith v. BreenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- Motel 6, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Ira Vernon Pfile, A/K/A I. Vernon Pfile and Virginia v. Pfile, A/K/A M. Virginia PfileCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.