Legal Opinion

State v. Hansen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 2002No. 20010586PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

¶ 1 Defendant Brad H. Hansen appeals from his convictions for aggravated kidnap-ing and rape. Specifically, he contends that the trial court violated his due process rights by failing to conduct an in camera review of his victim’s mental health counseling records to determine if any of them were material to his defense. We conclude that defendant failed to preserve this issue for review and thus affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 We review disputed facts in the light most favorable to the jury verdict. State v. Goddard, 871 P.2d 540, 542 (Utah 1994).

¶ 3 Defendant and the victim…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. State v. HolgateUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. EmmettUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Buehner Block Co. v. UWC ASSOCIATESUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. SaundersUtah Supreme Court · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. LowUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. WinfieldUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. LeeUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Cannon v. MullinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API