State v. Hansen
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HOWE, Justice:
INTRODUCTION
¶ 1 Defendant Brad H. Hansen appeals from his convictions for aggravated kidnap-ing and rape. Specifically, he contends that the trial court violated his due process rights by failing to conduct an in camera review of his victim’s mental health counseling records to determine if any of them were material to his defense. We conclude that defendant failed to preserve this issue for review and thus affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 We review disputed facts in the light most favorable to the jury verdict. State v. Goddard, 871 P.2d 540, 542 (Utah 1994).
¶ 3 Defendant and the victim…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. HolgateUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. EmmettUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- Buehner Block Co. v. UWC ASSOCIATESUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. SaundersUtah Supreme Court · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. LowUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. WinfieldUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. LeeUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- Cannon v. MullinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.