Legal Opinion
Neushul v. Regents of the University of California
District Court, C.D. California
Decided March 11, 2016No. Case No. CV 15-6286 FMO (ASx)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION
Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge
Having reviewed and considered all the briefing filed with respect to The Regents of the University of California’s (“defendant” or “Regents”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Fourth Cause of Action for Violation of California Labor Code § 1102.5 Pursuant to FRCP Rule 12(b)(6) (Dkt.12, “Motion”), the court concludes that oral argument is not necessary to resolve the Motion, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15; Willis v. Pac. Mar. Ass’n, 244 F.3d 675, 684 n. 2 (9th Cir.2001), and rules…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Terris v. Cnty. of Santa Barbara, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Terris v. Co. of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018