Legal Opinion

Galgano v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 27, 2004No. SC 17011PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KATZ, J.

The dispositive question in this reservation asks whether, under the underinsured motorist provision of the plaintiffs insurance policy, the plaintiff was entitled to compensation, for bystander emotional distress arising from his having witnessed bodily injury to his son, to the extent of the “each person” bodily injury coverage limit applicable to the plaintiff, when the defendant already had paid to the plaintiffs son the full amount of the “each person” bodily injury limit available to the son and the policy provided that the maximum amount that the defendant was required…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hopson v. St. Mary's HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  2. Clohessy v. BachelorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. Mendillo v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  4. Crabtree v. State Farm Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  5. Treichel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Jerry Garrison v. Rita BickfordTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  2. R.T. Vanderbilt Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  3. Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. FontaineSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  4. Connecticut Medical Insurance v. KulikowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. AllenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API