Scanlon v. Deuel
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom Porter Superior Court; Harry B. Tuthill, Judge. Application by James P. Scanlon for license to retail intoxicating liquor, against which George E. Deuel and others remonstrate. Prom a judgment for remonstrants, applicant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.
Appellant brought this proceeding before the commissioners of Lake county in March, 1909, to obtain a license to sell intoxicating liquors at retail. On May 1, 1908, a general remonstrance against the granting of a license “to all applicants” was filed under the provisions of §8332 Burns 1908, Acts 1905 p. 7.
Appellant challenged this remonstrance, by a verified pleading in six paragraphs, under §8333 Burns 1908, Acts 1907 p. 281.
The board of commissioners found that said remonstrance was signed by a majority of the legal voters of the township, and rendered judgment against the applicant and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightheiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Kelley v. BellIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Castle v. BellIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Evans v. EvansIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Cain v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Penick v. RatcliffeCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1927
- Atkinson v. DisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Treloar v. HarrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Territory v. ScullyHawaii Supreme Court · 1915
- State Ex Rel. Poston v. District CourtWyoming Supreme Court · 1928