Legal Opinion

Michaud v. Great Northern Nekoosa Corp.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 19, 1998PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATHEN, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Plaintiff Brian Michaud appeals from a summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Penobscot County, Mead, J.) in favor of defendants, Great Northern Ne-koosa Corporation (Great Northern) and Col-well Construction Company (Colwell). Plaintiff brought an action for negligent infliction of emotional distress, and the court ruled that defendants had no legal duty to protect him. On the theory that a “rescuer is not a bystander,” he urges us to recognize, for the first time, a duty of care to protect a rescuer from emotional distress even in the absence of a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wagner v. International Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Culbert v. Sampson's Supermarkets Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  3. Gammon v. Osteopathic Hospital of Maine, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
  4. Champagne v. Mid-Maine Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  5. Cameron v. PepinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Curtis v. PorterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  2. Flaherty v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  3. Elizabeth Brown v. Delta Tau DeltaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  4. Wendy Paola Destefano v. Children's National Medical CenterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Jennifer Zeno-Ethridge and Dennis Ethridge v. Comcast CorporationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2024

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API