Legal Opinion

Mathews v. Lamb

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1968No. 5546PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*650OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant was bound over to the district court following a preliminary hearing on the charge of forgery. A pre-trial petition for habeas corpus was denied, and appeal is taken from that order. Appellant’s sole contention is that the prosecution failed to establish the corpus delicti of the crime of forgery. We do not agree, and affirm the order denying habeas.

The charge of forgery is based on the false endorsement of a paycheck issued by the Central Telephone Company to Susan A. Cummings. Miss Cummings testified at the preliminary hearing that she was employed by the telephone company…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. WhitemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Application of BeasleyNevada Supreme Court · 1963
  3. People v. McGladeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Owen v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
  5. State v. FitzgeraldOregon Supreme Court · 1949

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cook v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Maskaly v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  3. United States v. James H. GilbertCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  4. State v. CollinsUtah Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API