Legal Opinion

TIERI v. Orbell

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 15, 1960No. Appeal, 343PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Watkins, J.,

This is an appeal from the refusal of the Municipal Court of Philadelphia to grant motions for a new trial and judgment non obstante veredicto, and entering-judgment for the plaintiff-appellee, in an action in assumpsit for the return of deposit money paid on account of the purchase of certain real estate in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Tlie appellants, Charles G. Kazanjian and Elizabeth M. Kazanjian, were the owners of premises situate at 101 South 63rd Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and they employed the defendant, Roy W. Orbell, a real estate broker, to effect the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Creighan v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Foulke v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. King v. ClarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Beato v. DiPilatoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Easton Theatres, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Land & Mortgage Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Proctor v. HoldenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  3. J.B. Van Sciver Co. v. William Cooper Associates, Inc. (In Re J.B. Van Sciver Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Ormond Realty v. NinnisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Newman v. SabloskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API