Legal Opinion

Foulke v. Miller

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1955No. Appeal, 27PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Bell,

This case arose by a bill in equity for an injunction. The basic issue is: Did the agreements which prohibited defendants from dealing in cinders and cinder aggregates include slag?

The defendant, H. Hessey Miller, and his wife formerly owned a cinder business in the City of Chester, Pa., and traded under the name of “H. Hessey Miller”. On or about January 1, 1943 Miller and his wife sold to plaintiffs a one-half interest in their business, which was described as that of “buying, selling and dealing in cinders and cinder products.” The purchase price was $20,000.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Waldman v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Barium Steel Corp. v. WileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Noonan EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Betterman v. American Stores Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Marshall v. Port AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. McRoberts v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Wrenfield Homeowners Ass'n v. DeYoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. International Organization Master, Mates & Pilots of America v. International Organization Masters, Mates & Pilots of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Homart Development Co. v. SgrenciSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API