Foulke v. Miller
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Bell,
This case arose by a bill in equity for an injunction. The basic issue is: Did the agreements which prohibited defendants from dealing in cinders and cinder aggregates include slag?
The defendant, H. Hessey Miller, and his wife formerly owned a cinder business in the City of Chester, Pa., and traded under the name of “H. Hessey Miller”. On or about January 1, 1943 Miller and his wife sold to plaintiffs a one-half interest in their business, which was described as that of “buying, selling and dealing in cinders and cinder products.” The purchase price was $20,000.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Waldman v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Barium Steel Corp. v. WileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Noonan EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Betterman v. American Stores Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Marshall v. Port AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- McRoberts v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Wrenfield Homeowners Ass'n v. DeYoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- International Organization Master, Mates & Pilots of America v. International Organization Masters, Mates & Pilots of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Homart Development Co. v. SgrenciSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.