Rothschild v. Hasbrouck
U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa
This was a suit by Emanuel Rothschild and others against J. J. Hasbrouck, M. O. Barnes, and others to set aside certain conveyances, as in fraud of creditors. Defendant Barnes filed two pleas-in abatement, to which plaintiffs except.
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLSON, District Judge.
The bill herein avers that plaintiffs duly recovered judgment in this court, by action at law, against defendant Hasbrouck, and that in said action defendant M. O. Barnes was duly garnished as a debtor of said Hasbrouck; that said Baines tiled his answer as such garnishee, showing in his possession, realized from sale of goods, etc., owned by said Hasbrouck, an amount exceeding plaintiffs’ said judgment; that in October, 1893, Hasbrouck, then a merchant at Humeston, Iowa, with intent to delay and defraud his creditors, and as part s of one and the same transaction, and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Covell v. HeymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Freeman v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
- STANTON v. Embrey, AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Krippendorf v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Heidritter v. Elizabeth Oil-Cloth Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Estate of MeinertSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Woren v. WitherbeeDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1917
- Swofford Bros. Dry-Goods Co. v. MillsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Wyoming · 1898
- Rothschild v. HasbrouckU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa · 1896