Legal Opinion

Rothschild v. Hasbrouck

U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa

Decided February 10, 1896Published

This was a suit by Emanuel and Abraham Rothschild against J. J. Hasbrouck, M. 0. Barnes, and others, to set aside an assignment. The cause was heard on the pleadings and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

WOOL-BOX, District Judge.

The bill alleges that plaintiffs, who compose the firm of E. Rothschild & Bros., are citizens of the state of Illinois, and were at the dates hereinafter named creditors of defendant J. J. Hasbrouck in the sum of $3,487.70, for which they have recovered in this court, and now own, a valid and subsisting judgment against said Hasbrouck; that upon October 9, 1893, defendant J. J. Hasbrouck (at that date a citizen of the state of Iowa, and engaged in business as a clothing merchant at Oorydon, Iowa) executed and delivered a deed of assignment for the benefit of Ms…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. South Branch Lumber Co. v. OttSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Clement v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  3. Rock Island Plow Co. v. Breese & BreeseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  4. Rothschild v. HasbrouckU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API