Legal Opinion

In re Lyman M.

New York City Family Court

Decided September 18, 1990Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Robert L. Estes, J.

The Commissioner of Social Services has filed a petition requesting an extension of placement, under Family Court Act § 355.3, and a specific direction from the court to the respondent that he attend school until age 18 and engage in treatment recommended by the Delaware County Alcoholism *92Clinic. Having been placed pursuant to Family Court Act § 353.3 (1) in care and custody of the petitioner on December 21, 1988, the respondent determined in or about early May of 1990, at age 17, to drop out of school in defiance of the petitioner’s directives.

Whether…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re Patricia A.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. In re Wendy C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. In re Terry UUAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. In re D. J.New York City Family Court · 1980
  5. People ex rel. Tara P. v. DiStefanoNew York City Family Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API