Legal Opinion

In re D. J.

New York City Family Court

Decided January 24, 1980PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

George A. Reed, J.

At the dispositional hearing the probation department reported that the respondent would be accepted at Berkshire Farm Center and Services for Youth. The order of disposition merely placed the respondent in the custody of the Commissioner of Social Services without restriction as to a particular *702agency or class of agencies. Berkshire has filed a petition, based on incorrigibility, for transfer of the respondent to the Division for Youth. The commissioner, in turn, has filed a petition for violation of the order of disposition.

The Law Guardian argues that…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Joe A.New York City Family Court · 1996
  2. In re Lyman M.New York City Family Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API