Legal Opinion
In re Patricia A.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 7, 1972PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Judge Fuld.
The appellant Patricia A. has been adjudicated a person in need of supervision (referred to at times as PINS) pursuant to section 712 (subd. [b]) of the Family Court Act. Such a person is there defined as “ a male less than sixteen years of age and a female less than eighteen years of age who does not attend school in accord with the provisions of part one of article sixty-five of the education law [relating to truancy or other nonattendance] or who is incorrigible, ungovernable or habitually disobedient and beyond the lawful control of parent or other lawful authority.” The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Harrigfeld v. District Court of Seventh Judicial District Ex Rel. County of FreemontIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
- Childs v. ChildsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- In re Cecilia R.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Maria Mercado, A/K/A Crespo v. Nelson A. Rockefeller, Governor of the State of New York,respondents-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.