Legal Opinion
Farr Man and Co., Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 26, 1982No. Court 79-10-01490PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOE, Judge:
By the institution of this action contesting the duty imposed upon raw sugar imported into the United States from Argentina, the validity and/or proper application of Presidential Proclamation 4547, has been placed in issue.
No material fact relied upon by plaintiffs or defendant is in controversy in their respective motions for summary judgment. Schoenfeld & Sons, Inc. v. United States, 3 C.I.T.-, Slip Op. 82-33 (April 30, 1982); Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance Co., 524 F.2d 1317 (1975).
In an effort to remedy the insufficiency of import fees previously established by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Reid v. CovertSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Whitney v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Florsheim Shoe Co., Div. of Interco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- Maple Leaf Fish Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- All Channel Products v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
- Clairol, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Golding Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.