Legal Opinion

Golding Bros. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided August 22, 1983No. Court No. 76-12-02775Published

1Opinion of the Court

Landis, Judge:

In this classification action plaintiff moves for summary judgment, defendant opposes said motion and cross-moves for summary judgment.

The subject merchandise herein, fabric manufactured by Johnston of Wemyss, known as Quality S. 3392 was produced in and exported from the United Kingdon and entered periodically at the Port of New York during 1971 and 1972. Customs classified the merchandise pursuant to TSUS item 335.60, as woven fabrics, of vegetable fibers (except cotton): . . . containing over 50 percent by *119weight of yarns which yarns are composed wholly or almost wholly of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  2. Mary Elizabeth Foy Donnelly v. H. Gibson GuionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  3. United States v. The J. B. Williams Company, Inc., and Parkson Advertising Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  4. S.S. Kresge Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
  5. Farr Man and Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API