Golding Bros. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Landis, Judge:
In this classification action plaintiff moves for summary judgment, defendant opposes said motion and cross-moves for summary judgment.
The subject merchandise herein, fabric manufactured by Johnston of Wemyss, known as Quality S. 3392 was produced in and exported from the United Kingdon and entered periodically at the Port of New York during 1971 and 1972. Customs classified the merchandise pursuant to TSUS item 335.60, as woven fabrics, of vegetable fibers (except cotton): . . . containing over 50 percent by *119weight of yarns which yarns are composed wholly or almost wholly of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Mary Elizabeth Foy Donnelly v. H. Gibson GuionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- United States v. The J. B. Williams Company, Inc., and Parkson Advertising Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- S.S. Kresge Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
- Farr Man and Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982