Legal Opinion

Schneider v. Bi-State Development Agency

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 1969No. 33308PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRUCE NORMILE, Special Judge.

The question presented by this appeal relates to the degree of care required in the operation of a streetcar towards pedestrians or the occupants of other vehicles.

Plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile involved in a collision with Defendant’s streetcar at the intersection of the Hodia-mont streetcar tracks and Page Boulevard in the City of St. Louis. Plaintiff sued for his injuries and recovered a verdict and judgment of $1,000.00.

Defendant appeals and urges prejudicial error by the submission of Instruction No. 4 (MAI 11.03) which defined the term…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Borgstede v. WaldbauerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  2. Frick v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1882
  3. Fortner v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  4. Melton v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  5. De Mariano v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lopez v. Three Rivers Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  2. Fowler v. Park Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  3. McTeer v. Clarkson Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Root ex rel. Root v. MuddMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Thelnor, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API