Legal Opinion

Ang v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 23, 2003No. 28389-1-IIPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, J.

Jessy A. and Editha A. Ang sued their former attorneys, Michael G. Martin and Richard Hansen, for legal malpractice and violations of the Consumer Protection Act. The allegations arose out of Martin and Hansen’s representation of the Angs on federal charges that had resulted in an acquittal. In this case, the trial court dismissed the legal malpractice action after the Angs failed to prove that they were innocent of the charged federal crime. Holding that proof of actual innocence is an essential element of legal malpractice for deficient conduct in a criminal trial, and finding no reversible…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. United States v. One Assortment of 89 FirearmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Eriks v. DenverWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. GefellerWashington Supreme Court · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ang v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Ang v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Burchfiel v. Boeing Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. Burchfiel v. Boeing Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Powell v. Associated Counsel for AccusedCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API