Legal Opinion

Citizens' State Bank of Okeene v. Cressler

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 6, 1917No. 6128PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Blaine County; James R. Tolbert, Judge. Action by the Citizens’ State Bank of Okeene, Okla., against E. E. Cressler, David R'usch, and others to foreclose a mortgage and for personal judgment on a note. From a judgment in favor of defendant David Rusch, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

POPE, O.

Adam Schuber, David Rusch, and J. H. Schuber gave a note to the plaintiff bank for $994.45, the first as principal, and the others as sureties. After the note became due the bank took a renewal note for $1,500 for this and another indebtedness of Adam Schuber; the renewal note being signed by Adam Schuber and David Rusch only, but secured by a second mortgage on land owned by Adam Schuber. After the maturity of this renewal note the bank at the request of both Rusch and Schu-ber accepted a part payment in cash and a renewal note for the sum of $1,350 for the balance. This…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Felton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Tapley v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  3. Owen v. United States Surety Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Bostwick v. . Van VoorhisNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  5. Reed v. Wolcott, GuardianSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McKenna v. NichlosSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  2. Staner v. McGrathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Lena v. ClinkenbeardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Rusch v. Citizens' State Bank of OkeeneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API