Rusch v. Citizens' State Bank of Okeene

Opinion by

PINKHAM, 0.

Thi.- was an action brought by the defendant In error, the Citizens’ State Bank, plaintiff in the court below, against the plaintiff in error, David Rusch,.defendant in the court below, upon a promissory note for $1,350, dated November 18, 3910. The parties wilt he referred to in lihi's appeal as in the trial court.

The defendant, in his answer to plaintiff’s, petition, admitted the execution and delivery of the note and alleged as a defense thereto that at the time he executed the note he did so as surety for the principal, Adam Scliuber. and that it was expressly agreed…