Legal Opinion

Stiteler v. Bell Telephone Co.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 4, 1977No. Appeal, No. 1801 C.D. 1976PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Bowman,

Before us is a petition for review in the nature of an appeal from an order of the Public Utility Commission (PUC) dismissing Chester W. Stiteler’s (Stiteler) complaint against The Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania (Bell). The PUC order was entered on September 20, 1976.

The history of a dispute between Stiteler and Bell leading to the PUC order reveals the following. Stiteler alleges that on July 23, 1974, Bell, without any right-of-way or easement, trespassed upon his land to lay a telephone cable. In the process of placing the cable, Bell allegedly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Behrend v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Johnstown-Pittsburgh Express, Inc. v. Public Utility Commission & W. C. McQuaide Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Scranton Electric Co. v. Avoca Borough School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Alderwoods (Pennsylvania), Inc. v. Duquesne Light Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Lehigh Valley Power Committee v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. City of Erie v. Pennsylvania Electric Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Fusaro v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. United States Steel Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API