Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Lusk

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 1, 1994No. A062846PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NEWSOM, J.

On July 22, 1987, respondent Emory Thomas was employed as an “aircraft repairer” at the Alameda Naval Air Station. While disassembling a jet engine in the course of his employment duties, respondent used a Garland No. 4 split-head hammer (hereafter the hammer), which he obtained from the “special tool rack,” to remove a disk from the turbine shaft of the jet engine. As he swung the hammer at the disk, the metal head disengaged from the handle, causing his left hand to contact the turbine blades. He sustained a severe injury to his left index finger.

Immediately after…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Daly v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Williams v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thomas v. LuskCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API